Start with the Market: Foundations for Legaltech GTM
Before you build your sales motion, you need to understand the terrain. This section helps you decode why legaltech is a category of its own, how to segment the legal ecosystem, and how to size your market with clarity, even when public data is scarce. Start here to ground your go-to-market strategy in facts, not assumptions.
1.01 Why Legaltech Is Different
Selling software into law firms isn’t like selling into other B2B verticals. The usual playbooks often break down fast. That’s because law firms are not just risk-averse, they're precedent-driven institutions with unique cultural norms, economic models, and decision-making dynamics. They operate in a world shaped by tradition, regulation, and reputation, and all of that bleeds into how they evaluate and adopt technology.
-
Buyer Conservatism: Unlike startups or tech-forward enterprises, lawyers are trained to minimize risk and avoid anything that deviates from the status quo. Even small product changes invite scrutiny. They want to see proof, precedent, and peer validation before they take a single step forward. A bold new solution often raises eyebrows unless it comes with client impact, ROI, or credibility from their peer network.
-
Gatekeepers Everywhere: Law firm sales cycles involve a distributed network of influencers and veto points. There is rarely one centralized buyer. Instead, you may be dealing with innovation leads, KM, IT, security, practice group heads, and procurement, each with their own agendas and thresholds. Your internal champion, no matter how enthusiastic, may lack the authority to push a deal through.
-
Long Sales Cycles: Even when you have buy-in, things move slowly. Law firms are notorious for fiscal misalignment, irregular budget cycles, and slow procurement processes. You may get greenlit for a pilot in Q1, but not see an actual kickoff until Q3 due to onboarding, redlining, or scheduling bottlenecks. A six-month pilot might require nine months just to get off the ground.
These factors make legaltech one of the toughest GTM environments for early-stage companies. But they also create defensibility. If you can establish trust, prove value, and survive procurement gauntlets, you’re rewarded with sticky customers, long retention cycles, and durable revenue. Getting in is hard. Getting ripped out is even harder.​
1.02 Mapping the Legaltech Landscape
​
Before you build a go-to-market strategy, you need to understand the terrain. Legaltech is not a single market, it's an archipelago of micro-markets defined by practice area, geography, buyer type, and firm size. If you treat "law firms" as a homogenous group, you’ll end up with vague messaging, unfocused outreach, and poor conversion rates.
Here are the layers that matter:
-
Practice Areas: Legal work is not created equal. A real estate lawyer thinks, behaves, and buys differently than a litigator or a regulatory advisor. Workflow complexity, data sensitivity, and automation potential vary widely by practice group.
-
Firm Tiers: At the top, BigLaw and global firms have enterprise budgets, multi-layered IT, and bureaucratic approval chains. At the bottom, boutique firms and solo shops are fast-moving but resource constrained. Mid-market firms often have the appetite but not the internal change management muscle.
-
Buyer Types: Don’t limit your lens to traditional law firms. In-house legal departments, ALSPs, legal process outsourcers, and legal ops consultants all have unique needs and adoption patterns. Your ICP might live in a different category than you assumed.
To build an effective GTM strategy, you need to pick a beachhead. That means looking at where your product’s value proposition aligns with a segment’s most urgent pain. For example, selling document automation into boutique real estate firms might require a price-sensitive, no-integration offering, while selling workflow tools into a global litigation practice might demand integrations with NetDocuments, SSO compatibility, and advanced reporting.
The most successful legaltech startups don’t try to win the whole market at once. They pick an under-served, high-pain niche and dominate it before expanding.
​​
1.03 TAM vs. SAM vs. SOM for Legaltech
​
Legaltech founders often fall into the trap of thinking their market is bigger than it really is. The temptation to pitch a "$20B+" market size to investors leads to inflated assumptions that create downstream problems when GTM efforts don’t convert at scale. A better approach is to use the TAM/SAM/SOM framework, but with legal-specific nuance.
-
TAM (Total Addressable Market): This is the maximum possible market size if every law firm, ALSP, or legal department in the world adopted your solution. It’s useful for showing ambition, but largely theoretical, especially in legal, where adoption barriers remain high.
-
SAM (Serviceable Available Market): This is your realistic reach, considering your product’s current functionality, language support, integration needs, and go-to-market motion. For example, if your product only supports NetDocuments and is priced for mid-size U.S. firms, you can exclude firms on iManage or those based outside North America.
-
SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market): This is the most critical number for an early-stage company. It reflects the portion of the SAM you can reasonably capture within the next 24‑36 months based on your current sales capacity, pricing, team bandwidth, and brand awareness.
Public benchmarks are hard to come by in legaltech, so you’ll need to triangulate using:
-
Number of firms in your chosen jurisdiction and tier (e.g., Am Law 200, UK Top 100)
-
Average software spend per firm (typically 1–3% of revenue, though skewed by category)
-
Benchmark adoption rates from adjacent tools (e.g., CLM, e-discovery, document management)
Let’s say your ICP includes 2,000 mid-size firms in English-speaking countries. If 20% have budget and pain today, and your ACV is $35K, your SOM is: 2,000 × 20% × $35K = $14M. That’s a healthy starting point. You don’t need a billion-dollar TAM to build a great company, you need a reachable, retainable, and referenceable segment.
​​